AnalyzingIslam

A systematic, filterable review of textual, moral, historical, and logical problems in the Quran and the Hadiths.

I

The scale of it

Every entry cites one specific passage, in a Muslim-approved edition. This is how much has been read.

0Entries
0Categories
0Quran verses reviewed
0Hadiths reviewed

What this is

Every entry cites a specific passage — either a Quranic verse or a hadith from one of the six canonical Sunni collections (Bukhari, Muslim, Abu Dawud, Tirmidhi, Nasa'i, Ibn Majah) — explains what it says in plain language, and builds a philosophical, historical, or moral argument for why it presents a problem. Where relevant, entries also provide the standard Muslim response and push back on it.

Quranic verses are quoted from the Saheeh International English translation, the Saudi-sanctioned mainstream Sunni edition. Hadiths are quoted from widely published English translations of the same collections Sunni jurisprudence itself treats as authoritative. Using Muslim-approved sources removes the easy dismissal of "hostile translation" or "fringe report."

II

Browse by category

All 31 themes, from abrogation to warfare. Hover to pause.

III

The strongest arguments

Every entry is rated by argumentative scope and force — Basic (narrow in scope), Moderate (substantive but contestable or limited in reach), or Strong (strikes a foundational claim, is hard to dismiss, and holds up against the standard response). Start with the Strong tier.

IV

Today's Arguments

Three cases, reshuffled every day — tap any card to read the full argument.