Diyya for Non-Muslim Is Half (or Third) of Muslim's
Nasa'i 4742 reinforces the differential-diyya framework. The substantive issues are addressed in entries d18 and t20. The Nasa'i contribution: cross-collection independent attestation of the religious-class hierarchy in Islamic compensation law.
The analysis from entries d18 and t20 applies fully here.
- P1. Nasa'i 4742 preserves the differential diyya framework with religious-class hierarchy.
- P2. The hadith is in multiple canonical collections — overwhelming cross-collection attestation.
- P3. The framework codifies non-Muslim lives as worth less than Muslim lives in financial compensation.
- P4. Combined with gender halving (entry d05), the system produces intersectional reductions.
- P5. The framework continues in modern Muslim-majority application.
- P6. Modern Muslim apologetic responses (Hanafi equalisation, procedural defense) cannot fully refute the textual basis.
- P7. A morally serious revelation does not codify religious-class hierarchy in human-life valuation. (See entries d18, t20.)
Nasa'i 4742 reinforces the differential-diyya framework. (See entries d18, t20 for substantive analysis.)
Hanafi school equalises diyya — Islam admits multiple interpretations.
Minority position; most schools differential. (See d18.)
Diyya reflects 7th-century economy; modern reform is appropriate.
The framework codifies religious supremacy; reform is partial. (See d18.)
Procedural rule, not moral judgment.
The procedure determines life-valuation. (See d18.)
Modern Muslim states reform under pressure.
Reform is uneven and externally driven. (See d18.)
Other ancient legal systems were similar.
Most have been reformed; Islamic textual basis remains. (See d18.)